top of page
1_edited.jpg

Blade and Bow 12 Year Solera Reserve Review

Writer: Garrett
Garrett
Sep 1
4 min read
Blade and Bow 12 Year Solera Reserve

On Kentucky Derby Day in 1935, Julian "Pappy" Van Winkle opened Stitzel-Weller in Louisville and built it around wheat instead of rye — a softer, rounder bourbon that would eventually turn Pappy Van Winkle and W.L. Weller into the bottles people camp outside liquor stores for. The Van Winkle family ran the distillery for 37 years, it changed hands a few more times after that, and it stopped distilling entirely in 1992 when production shifted to the newly built Bernheim plant. What didn't move was the whiskey already resting in Stitzel-Weller's open-window rickhouses — barrels of genuinely irreplaceable wheated bourbon, aging quietly inside a distillery that no longer made anything new.

Diageo ended up owning that site and whatever remained of that stock, and in 2015 built an entire brand around stretching it as far as it could go: Blade and Bow. The name comes from a skeleton key — the blade is the shaft, the bow is the part you turn — and each bottle ships with one of five brass keys on a cord, standing in for the five steps of making bourbon: grain, yeast, fermentation, distillation, and aging. The bourbon itself leans on the solera process I wrote about yesterday: barrels that never fully drain, younger bourbon constantly feeding in behind the old, so that some fraction of actual pre-1992 Stitzel-Weller whiskey theoretically survives in every bottle, no matter how many years pass.

I've had a complicated relationship with the standard Blade and Bow bottle for a while now. I bought my first one back in 2020, a week or two before COVID shut everything down, sitting next to a 1.5L of Buffalo Trace in the same haul. It didn't wow me, and it was a year or two before I bought a second one — but I've never regretted owning it either. It's a genuinely nice bottle to have out for guests, both for the history behind it and for how it looks doing nothing on a shelf. I never quite landed on whether it was built for my palate specifically, or one I appreciated more for what it represents.

The 12 Year Solera Reserve is a different animal, and it's the reason I'm back on this brand. Released in July 2026 as a limited annual expression — and, happily for me, actually distributed here in Texas, along with North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Georgia, Illinois, and Kentucky — it takes that same solera-aged, Stitzel-Weller-lineage bourbon and runs it through a second, more elaborate finish across four cask types: Port and Bordeaux for dark fruit and tannin, Cognac for fruit esters, and Moscatel for aromatic lift and sweetness. Nicole Austin, Diageo's director of American whiskey liquid development, built it with the goal of getting real fruit and tannin structure into the bourbon without it collapsing into one dominant note the way a lot of single-cask finishes do. Bottled at 104 proof and priced at $64.99, it's the most ambitious thing this brand has done since the original solera concept itself. I've never had the 22 Year to compare it to, but this alone made me want to sit down and actually pay attention to Blade and Bow again.

The Bottle

Distillery: Stitzel-Weller Distilling Co.

Release: 2026 — Limited Annual Expression

Classification: Bourbon (Solera-Finished)

Proof: 104 (52% ABV)

Age: 12 Years

Mash Bill: Undisclosed

MSRP: $64.99

First Impression: The nose opens with ripe plum and a toasted almond edge, vanilla rounding things out underneath a backbone of charred oak — it announces the cask-finishing before the glass even reaches your lips.

On the Palate: The body runs dry rather than syrupy, with dark cherry and honey settling over a thread of leather and that same almond note carrying through from the nose. The heat stays gentle throughout, letting the fruit lead instead of the proof.

The Last Sip: The finish runs medium, drifting from raisin and vanilla into tobacco leaf, with a last dusting of cinnamon closing things out.

Final Thoughts

Fruit is the word that kept coming back to me, both nosing this and following through on the palate. There's a light tannic edge on the finish from all that wine-and-cognac-cask influence, but it never tips into astringent — it just gives the back end some structure. For a bourbon that started life as a fairly standard Stitzel-Weller solera blend and then got run through four different cask types on top of that, that's a genuinely tricky needle to thread, and Nicole Austin threads it here. This tastes like something built with real intention, not just a novelty finish bolted onto an existing bottle.

I still haven't had the 22 Year, so I can't tell you how this stacks up against Blade and Bow's top-shelf release. But it does make me hope this 12 Year becomes part of an ongoing pattern rather than a one-off — bourbon in general is seeing more age-stated, more deliberately finished releases lately, and if this is the direction Blade and Bow wants to keep pushing, I'm interested. I'd happily see another Stitzel-Weller release built this way.

At $64.99, it's priced fairly for what's in the bottle, but it's also not one I'd tell you to go chase down blind. This is a bottle worth ordering at a bar or splitting with friends first — get a read on the fruit-forward profile before you commit to a full bottle, especially if your rotation leans toward more traditional wheated bourbon.

Have you gotten your hands on the 12 Year yet, or are you still working through the standard release? I'd like to hear where people land on it.

🟡 Try at a Bar or Bottle Share

Comments


The First Pour

What happened in bourbon and BBQ, and what it actually means. The releases worth chasing, the ones that aren't, and why brisket costs what it does. No hype, no spam.

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page